The Jeff Hostetler of Blogs


I only deal in awesome links:
| Buy me stuff | The definitive games list | ILX (come back!) | #1 site of all time | Know the canon | Amazing labor of love | Japanese pop chart resource | Comedic genius |

Blogs:
| Armchair Civ | Slightly below "Some Dude" status | Live Shit: Binge & Purge | BloggaPlease | 33 1/3 |

Monday, January 03, 2005

 
Kylie Minogue - "Made Of Glass"

So here we are at the beginning of the new year, 2005, in the midst of the annual music release hibernation period. Seems fitting that the first new track I hear is this sleepy little pop/club churner, caught somewhere in limbo between potentially lighting up the charts as a future smash or being lost as a forgotten b-side. You have to wonder how long this one's been sitting in the Xenomania vaults, seeing as that it's much more reminiscent of Brian Higgins' early work with Chicane and Cher rather than their more recent barnstormers. "Made Of Glass" sticks to a proven formula closely, melding Kylie's whispery vocals with expansive, winding synths, subdued cymbal rushes, and a hint of guitar, all while a gentle club beat keeps everything afloat. It's very pretty to say the least and a step up from "Giving You Up" and the overrated "I Believe In You". The only problem I have with the song is with Kylie herself. I'm not convinced that her precious, wide-eyed vocal approach is the right one. I think this song is just begging for a little more stylish pizzaz. Word has already spread that "Made Of Glass" has been given to Rachel Stevens and that this current version will probably never see the light of day as an official release. Rachel isn't necessarily a better singer than Kylie (neither of them are exceptional), but her voice is certainly a bit warmer and more expressive. People always talk about Britney sounding and acting robotic in her performances, which I always find puzzling considering how Kylie seems the better target for such accusations. Now don't get me wrong, I think Kylie's released a fair amount of strong material. I just find her vocals to be somewhat joyless, even distant at times, injected with too much professionalism. I'm hoping that with Rachel at the helm and perhaps some additional reworking, we'll see this return, next time with the flash, vitality, and showmanship it deserves.

Archives

January 2002   February 2002   March 2002   April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   February 2004   April 2004   May 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   May 2007   July 2007   September 2007   October 2007   December 2007   February 2008   May 2008   June 2008   October 2008  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?